The 300 is a big, heavy lens. Could you do without it on a regular basis?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/13/04 01:22PM >>> Hi Guys; I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy. So I'm thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not shooting something specific. My current lineup: Z-1p, K1000, K 28/3.5, K 35/3.5, M 50/1.4, A 50/1.7, M 50/2.0, M 100/4.0 macro, M 135/3.5, M 200/4.0, FA* 300/4.5, set of extension tubes, 50mm tube for M 100/4.0, small Vivitar flash. I'm thinking of breaking it down to 2 bags. The main bag would be the Z-1p, 35, 50/1.4, 135, 300, and the flash. The #2 bag would be the rest minus the m 50/2.0. Obviously if I'm shooting something that another lens would be useful I can put it in. Any suggestions to selection? Or any other suggestions. Butch Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself. Hermann Hesse (Demian)
