Gosh, I would not pay the cost of G5 for the speed it offers. The
fastest G5 with dual processor is not even close to my dual Opteron
2.0GB. I use this machine extensively for doing advertising and photo
editing. It offers 64-bit, but I don't really care since Windows 64 is
not yet available until Q4 this year - but even with Windows XP, this is
the fastest machine for now. I found Windows-based systems are easier to
upgrade or modify. I can change the components anytime I want - plus I
could still play few games that I like - which is NOT available on Mac.
All in all, you must admit that Windows-based system is the most widely
used on this planet - regardless the endless bugs Microsoft tries to
patch. It simply rules - so it's better *somehow* than any other OS.

I can't help it - I just woke up with HUNDREDS of messages from PDML.
I'm usually a passive member. I enjoy reading and sorting to see if
there are useful things for me. COME'ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PS: The FASTEST Big Mac would still be available from MacDonalds. It's
available with all of the optionals just under 3 minutes at even more a
fraction of a cost - $2.49 here.




-----Original Message-----
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME

Well OSX runs just fine on my G4 1 gig. Do you own a Mac? Nobody said 
OSX was 64 bit either. As far as I am aware the new G5 chips are 64 bit 
but OSX isn't yet. As to price I think you are wrong, a similarly 
specced Wintel machine will cost the same or more than a Mac. Did you 
not hear about the Virginia Tech big mac - the worlds 3rd fastest super 
computer, at the fraction of the cost of competing systems, including 
AMD and Intel.

As far as I am aware there is no spy-ware nor viruses on OSX. I believe 
that is by design.

Antonio


On 18 May 2004, at 16:52, Shawn K. wrote:

> OSX flaws...  For one thing OSX is hugely processor hungry.  For 
> another,
> I'm sorry to say, but it isn't 64 bit either, thats just some BS the
> Macintosh marketing department fed you.  So before you go ranting on
> Microsoft, I think you should pause and think about how Mac's are 
> largely
> way more expensive than an equivalent windows machine, and Macintosh 
> is just
> as likely to lie to you as any other big company.  Also, regarding the
> spyware, that has nothing to do with windows, spyware is a legitimate
> software in the eyes of the OS, it's just legitimate software that 
> spys on
> you... Spyware does not exploit a flaw in a the system...  It can just

> as
> easily show up in a friggin Unix supercomputer should someone feel the

> need
> to write such a program.  What would be the use of writing a Mac 
> virus??
> Yeah imagine the chaos when artists around the world can't doctor up 
> their
> image files...  It's not quite the same as costing corporations 
> billions now
> is it??  Or using a virus to DOS a large website like SCO and 
> Microsoft???
> You couldn't do that writing virii for a Mac, and thats why you don't 
> see
> them for the Mac.
>
> -Shawn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
>
>
> I don't need to. I also use Mac OSX, which is virus free and works
like
> a dream come true. But that doesnt mean that I should not be
> dissatisfied with shoddy workmanship. I guess if Windows were a small
> bit player I would give them some more slack - but the market leading
> de facto world standard in computing? I think they should be doing
> betterl, a lot better.
> Antonio
> On 18 May 2004, at 17:17, Bill Owens wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Antonio Aparicio" Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
>>>
>>>
>>>> What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft shareholders
>>>> or
>>>> something? All I said was that Windows was a substandard operating
>>>> system and that it was riddled with viruses and spyware and that we
>>>> the
>>>> users deserved better, especially given the money the company
makes.
>>
>> If you're so dissatisfied, invent an operating system to replace it.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>


Reply via email to