In a message dated 5/30/2004 9:18:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At this point, I really don't see it as better, or worse than film.
Different? Most definitely. Superior? Not a chance. William Robb --------------- Neither do I, see it as better than film. At least as regards the end result. But for me the process of TAKING pictures is better (or smoother or easier or something), because I can review what I have taken. Yes, that makes a difference for me. It aids my on-going learning process. And I don't have to worry about burning film "wasting shots," which means it allows me to play around more and try more, which also aids my on-going learning process. And the one good lab around here is not that close to me, so I also save on driving time and frustration over traffic. Process and results are different things, naturally. Marnie aka Doe Which doesn't cover the post processing stuff. That's another ball game in itself.
