>
> ----- Original Message -----
>from Bill Robb
>
> They are all pretty good.
> The old Tak 75mm f/4.5 is prone to flare, but is very sharp, the new
> 75mm f/2.8 is most excellent, according to Aaron Reynolds (former
> list member from Ontario).
He still rants and raves about it Bill<g>
> I don't know about the 55mm lenses, the SMC 45mm f/4 is superb,
> though Rob Studdert didn't think it was as good as he would have
> liked.
> I don't recall what it was he didn't like.
> The 135 macro is excellent, as is the 150mm in either of it's
> emulations.
> The 165mm LS and 90mm LS are also both excellent lenses.
> The 200mm Tak isn't the greatest, the new SMC one is apparently very
> good indeed, as is the SMC 300mm f/4.
I bought, last October, a used Super Multi Coated Tak 200 f 4 and i think its the best
lens is have ever
owned.Nice and crisp shots with this one.Only complaint is the built in hood.Its kinda
floppy but there is
one spot it seems to catch,just have to fiddle with it is all.No biggy.:-)
Dave Brooks
>
> William Robb
>
>
