How do you think it compares to the DA 16-45? t
On 6/6/04 16:58, William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom C" > Subject: Regarding Zenitar & NON-A lenses on *istD > > > >> With that said, I'm pretty happy with the quality from the > Zenitar... not >> the best I'm sure, but a lot of bang for the buck. > > I was quite impressed with the Zenitar. I thought it was quite sharp, > and it didn't seem at all prone to flare. My only complaint was that > it's colour rendition was almost cartoonlike. > Very contrasty lens. > I found a Tak 17mm fisheye, and sold the Zenitar, as I couldn't > justify keeping two fisheye lenses. > > William Robb > > > >
