----- Original Message ----- From: "Timothy Sherburne" Subject: Re: Regarding Zenitar & NON-A lenses on *istD
> > How do you think it compares to the DA 16-45? Well, I think they are two very different lenses, one being a fisheye, the other a rectilinear zoom. OTOH, they 16-45 seemed like a pretty good lens for the few minutes I had one on the camera. Quite big though. William Robb > > > I was quite impressed with the Zenitar. I thought it was quite sharp, > > and it didn't seem at all prone to flare. My only complaint was that > > it's colour rendition was almost cartoonlike. > > Very contrasty lens. > > I found a Tak 17mm fisheye, and sold the Zenitar, as I couldn't > > justify keeping two fisheye lenses. > > > >
