Hi, >> No, not intending to debate the chicken or egg. It's obvious the chicken >> came first.
> If you accept the evolution theory, the answer would actually be that the > egg came first. It was laid by an animal that was nearly, but not quite, a > hen. I don't think you can appeal to evolution here. Evolution tells us that chickenhood is not a fixed state, not a destination or a Platonic ideal, but part of a seamless continuum, identified retrospectively. Chickenhood is a realm of infinite possibilities, never-ending branches exploring the boundaries of identity, pecking at the futility of definitions plucked from our cooped minds. -- Cheers, Chuck Darwin
