We knew what you meant...
Tom C.
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: On Sharpness (Confusion) Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:13:44 +1000
On 9 Jun 2004 at 8:59, Rob Studdert wrote:
Oh I wish I had an editor :-(
>This means that if
> the image is not very sharp and has no sharpening artifacts you're likely not
> see a difference in the before and after images.
Should read:
"if the image is not very sharp and has sharpening artifacts"
> Now have a guess at which side was the original? I'll give you a hint, it's the
> one that's lost resolution :-)
Should read:
"Now have a guess at which side was the original? I'll give you a hint, it's
the one that hasn't lost resolution"
Sorry for the confusion.
Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
