So true.  Another point:  For some folks $1000 isn't that expensive. 
They easily spend this kind of money on TVs and videocams.  They just
buy the Rebel as a high end P&S.  

I think DReb is pretty ugly, but I do think the D70 is knida nice.  I
epxect the Baby D will have quite a bit of silver.


Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/04 08:49AM >>>
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:36:40 +0200, you wrote:

>OK, Jostein,
>
>You and the others who posted on this subject have convinced me. It
makes
>little sense to me, but I can accept that many snapshooters are now
buying a
>DLSR. Hopefully, while most of them will store those cameras in
adrawwer
>after a while, some will grow as amateur photographers, and that's a
good
>thing.
>
>Dario
>
Our daughter is a good example of a snapshooter.  A few years ago when
she was in her early twenties I gave her a very nice ME Super set with
a couple of primes, a zoom, and a flash.  She was thrilled, and using
this nice set she caught the snapshooting bug.  

So what did she buy for an upgrade from the ME Super? Canon Rebel. Kit
lens short zoom. 70-300 that I bought her for a present. Now, a couple
of years later, she has added the Digital Rebel as her primary camera,
which came with an 18-55 kit lens.  Most likely she has reached her
equipment saturation point, and probably won't ever upgrade again.

Snapshooter behavior: On her recent trip to Hawaii, she took one 512mb
card.  As it filled up, she made more space by editing the bad ones,
then started lowering the resolution to get more on the same card.  It
never occurred to here to go spend the bucks for another CF card, or
an image tank, or the other options.  She thought it was perfectly
okay to lower the resolution to get more pics on her one card.

BTW, the Digital Rebel is an odd gunmetal color, which gets more ugly
the more I look at it.  But for all its plastic body, it still feels
fairly sturdy, and is much larger than one would expect, especially
compared to the *istD.

--
John Mustarde
www.photolin.com 

Reply via email to