On 23 Jun 2004 at 6:32, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I know about IE. Mine's not set to adjust image sizes. I found that the > quality suffers considerably. And there are some photos that I don't want > adjusted, so I've gotta go back and forth to making adjustments. Just a > PITA. There's no reason for someone to post huge images that take a long > time to DL on slow dial up connections and then have to be fiddled with in > order to be seen. Of course, that's just my feeling, but I bet it's a > problem or an annoyance to others, too.
I think it's great being able to zoom in when an image has detail that would otherwise be lost in a size reduction. If you wish to move to lowest common denominator then images should probably only be published at 600 pixel max length regardless of the fact that some of us may have desk-tops of 2048x1536 or bigger. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
