Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 9:06:39 AM, Alan wrote:
AC> I checked their optical diagrams and they look identical. Interestingly, the
AC> AF Nikkor 105/2.8 macro also has the same optical diagram as the Pentax
AC> F/FA100/2.8 macro.

You can't tell from the diagrams. They are very simplified, do not
show precise curvature, do not show the type of glasses used, do not
show exact spacing...

Tessar from one company looks the same as Tessar from another company
(yet their performance might differ greatly). Your typical 6/7
1.4/50mm lens has about the same diagram as another 6/7 gr/el 1.4/50mm
lens. But in fact, that's just because they evolved from the same
design, and are today the peak of that design. Modern lenses like
Leitz's turned off from Gaussian design, just because it was
"depleted" of novel design ideas.

What counts is the manufacturing quality, choice of special glasses, control
quality, mount quality...

Your typical 2.8/14mm lens is very probably the same design as well,
you just can't make such ultrawide in many different ways. You just
tweak it here and there.

Rumors like that surface time to time, and mostly, are meaningless.
Not that 3rd party lens makers can't make excellent lenses, they can -
given enough money, though.

Fra

Reply via email to