My take on filters is that I am swaying to not using them.

I used to use filters always, on every lens, if only as a protection.
Even the works Betacam had a UV on the front - and boy that came in
useful. One day I was using an unfamiliar car with a lift-up tailgate and
the camera caught the corner of it whilst being moved ready for de-
rigging from the tripod. The filter took the impact square on and
immediately broke. Because the filter glass took the brunt, the corner of
the tailgate did not penetrate any further, and no damage at all to the
front element of a �6000 lens.

However, I have always been aware that there is inevitably an increase in
flare using filters on lenses with inadequate lens shading (for whatever
reason). This started to bug me quite a bit and now I have turned full
circle and do not use filters on most lenses. This is anything wider than
100mm, even shaded. I still have a filter on a 70-200, but even there I
am doubting it's worth. Jury's still out on that one. I certainly do not
use one on a mid range zoom like a 24-70, nor primes like 50 and 24. I
think that each shooting situation has to be assessed individually
regarding whether or not flare is evident, but my default is not to have
a filter aboard.

When lenses are in the bag, they are capped. When they come out of the
bag, the caps come off and stay in the bag, always. Even on that Smegma
14mm 2,8 which many have seen at GFM - the front element is bulbous -
must be very similar to the new Pentax 14mm. But the built-in lens hood
does protect the front element to a degree, and I am more than
comfortable with carrying it un-capped.

As for the TV camera? It does *not* have a filter in place anymore. Aha,
you ask, why is this, especially after that opening cautionary tale ?
Well, us staff guys don't own our kit, and one of our chaps had a very
unfortunate accident with his camera. He left it unattended on the tripod
in a wind (a big no-no, but I don't know the exact circumstances) and
surprise surprise it blew over onto the lens. The camera was repairable
but the lens was a write off and a few days later he had a brand new lens
delivered to replace the ageing dinosaur that succumbed. My lens is only
4 years old, but I would never say no to a new one ;-)




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|    www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_____________________________



Reply via email to