Well "die" means that eventually it will disappear. I think what you
mean is that it will ocuppy an ever smaller share of the market.
A.
On 17 Jul 2004, at 18:18, Jens Bladt wrote:
I did say that it would die, in increasingly slower rate - that means I
think the curve will flatten and in the end and find a nwe steady
level -
not deissapear totally.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 17. juli 2004 15:42
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Film is Dying? (was Pentax is Dying?)
On 17 Jul 2004 at 14:34, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
I dunno, I think film is doing fine considering. Sure a lot of people
will switch to digital for the convenience factor, but it is a bit
extreme to say film is dying (i.e. that it will eventually completely
disappear) - the results you get from film are just too good. Anyway
we
are talking just 35mm here - in MF and LF film still rules the roost,
and apart from say sport and newspaper photogs, most pro's use MF
anyway.
My *ist D seems to be teamed up with my Mamiya MF gear quite often but
35mm
film holds little appeal for me these days but for the full frame
coverage
it
offers.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
