[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Unless Canon actually does what is rumored and puts out a 10D replacement 
>at 8MP

I think that would be a very smart move for them if they could make it
happen. Perhaps keeping as much of the 10D chassis as possible and
leaving out all the high-speed technology of the 1D2 might get them
there. Remembering that the Nikon D100 and Canon D60 were about $2200 or
so when first introduced, I'd say that a price under $2500 would make an
8MP, 1.3x-crop 10D replacement very successful. Heck, the D30 was
successful at around $3000, so I'd say even that price point would make
a stripped-down 8MP, 1.3x DSLR a winner.

It would cement Canon's dominance in the digital arena my drawing a
clear division between "amateur" DSLR's (6MP, 1.5 crop) and professional
DSLR's (1.3x or full-frame and 8MP or more). Perhaps this would be
largely psychological, based as much on marketing as actual requirements
of working photographers, but we all know that kind of thing has a major
driving effect on the market. (Just browse the rec.photo.digital
newsgroup for a couple of days to see it in all its nauseating detail.)

My guess is that making a sub-$3000 8MP, 1.3x DSLR is what Canon *wants*
to do. Let's see if they can pull it off. Or when.

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com

Reply via email to