[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12.08.04 7:01: > Here's an example of what I'm complaining about: > > http://members.aol.com/ernreed/2bright.jpg > > The only thing I did to this image was resize it in Photoshop Elements. Much > of > the EXIF data seems to have survived this. Ern, check customs functions in *istD if exposure is not linked to AF point. If yes, it can give in certain situations (darker than 18% grey part of picture right under choosen AF point) such a overexposure. -- Best Regards Sylwek
- Re: istD overexposure Jostein
- Re: istD overexposure ernreed2
- Re: istD overexposure ernreed2
- RE: istD overexposure David Miers
- Re: istD overexposure Joseph Tainter
- Re: istD overexposure ernreed2
- Re: istD overexposure Tom C
- Re: istD overexposure Rob Studdert
- istD overexposure ernreed2
- Re: istD overexposure Herb Chong
- Re: istD overexposure Sylwester Pietrzyk
- Re: istD overexposure jtainter
- Re: istD overexposure Tom C
- Re: istD overexposure Kostas Kavoussanakis
- Re: istD overexposure jtainter
- Re: istD overexposure Tom C
- RE: istD overexposure Joseph Tainter
- Re: istD overexposure Herb Chong

