J. C. O'Connell wrote on 12.08.04 14:46: > the 14/n is 13Mpixel, none of the APS are even close to that > so the 3K difference is more than just FF, its much higher > image quality too. Yes and no :-) Most people can't afford this and will choose something much cheaper with quality satisfying for them.Image quality-wise - Kodak has much worse noise above iso400 than almost any APS CCD, and many modern wide angle lenses, even equipped with ED glass, suffer from high level of chromatic aberrations. So there is always trade-off. Resolution-wise there is no doubt that such a FF sensor delivers higher quality...
-- Best Regards Sylwek
