Strong language warning below:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerald Cermak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 26, 2001 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery Questions answered
> This is a good point. I have many pics from the last couple
of months using
> my LX, and while specifically shot in the hope they would be
good enough to
> share, and possible even share in a Pug gallery, I cannot
honestly claim
> they were shot for the PUB LX Commemorative Gallery.
>
> Is this rule bendable? Why does it exist? Does it imply some
unwritten
> theme must apply - like "LX Celebration" - or "shots not
easily attainable
> with a camera other than an LX"? Some other silly thing like
that?
I tossed that one in as a spur of the moment thing, with the
hope that we could do a gallery specific body of work, rather
than throwing whatever we had sitting around the house. As I
tend to be a consencus driven PUG meister, and having seen a few
objections to rule 2, I will entertain the possibility of
dropping criteria #2.
Thanks
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
