On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Trevor Bailey wrote: > If I wanted to lay down the cash, I want a Pentax, But price is telling > me 300D Canon. As to the 10D, have never seen one in the flesh.
Trevor, Price once told you to buy the MZ-60; was that a good decision? How much money did you lose on it so as to upgrade to a more functional camera? Add the fact that you already have a few Pentax lenses and see the big equation, not just the initial outlay. My feeling is that the 300D is a money-pinching instrument on behalf of Canon, a brutally downsized <fill in the right Canon model>. I hope that Graywolf was right in his comments the other day that the Baby-D will not be the same thing, though my motive for that is all to do with brand allegiance rather than any impending personal choice. Kostas (I think the main question is "do I want to go digital" and thus still think that my next camera will be an -S, not a -D).
