"Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >A while ago, I questioned whether files from *istD would suffice for >A3 enlargement. I put a full size version of this image online: > >http://www.oksne.net/paw/wintermarsh.html > >The image is so full of minute detail that I had my doubts it could be >blown up larger than A4. > >Cotty and Paul Stenquist set out to prove me wrong. A couple of days >later I received a print from Paul made on an Epson 2200 onto a >radiant white watercolour paper. The quality was excellent, even to my >prejudice mind. Cotty had printed on glossy paper with his Canon (I >forget the model), and thus the two prints were hard to compare for >differences among the printers. However, the two results clearly >showed that A3 enlargements are well within reach with a 6 Mpix >camera. <snip> >I must say I'm puzzled, astonished and impressed with the result, and >relieved to have been proven wrong in my suspicions. > >So now I'm seriously considering an A3 printer...:-)
Jostein, where were you at Grandfather Mountain when I was passing around my Super B3 (13 x 19 inches or 33 x 48 cm) prints from the Epson 1270? Several of them were ist-D shots. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
