I have yet to try a a3 off the *istD on my 2200 but the A4's look very good! from what I have seen a 36x24 won't be too difficult to do once proper care ( and a good original shot! )
--- Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jostein wrote: > > > So I got curious. I asked a pro-lab in Oslo to go > as large as _they_ > > considered reasonable quality, and told them the > file was from a 6 > > Mpix DSLR. They print on a Epson Pro 9600. What I > got back was an A2 > > enlargement. At this size, it was easy to spot the > blurring of details > > less than 3 pixels across. The Pentax way of > anti-aliasing made them > > blend together. There were no artificial coloring > or moire, though. > > Another gripe was that contrast got a bit out of > hand, so that dark > > detail became jagged edges or little squares, 2-3 > pixels across. > > They (you) had to interpolate the file up before > printing, just to keep 200 > to 300 dpi! That way you can ALWAYS get rid of > visible pixelation (no extra > detail though). > > Dario Bonazza > > ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
