If you say that you know the pictured camera was his I'l accept that. In fact, I'll save the photo of it in my archives. I didn't mean to disparage Jim, his memory, or his camera. But like others, the picture struck me as unlikely. But hell, that black paint wears fast. Thanks for sharing the pic.

Who was the other rather famous rock and roll photographer who had a studio right at the north end of the San Fernando Valley? In the days when he had taken to renting out his studio to motion picture production companies, I spent some time there and I''ll be damned if I can remember his name.
Paul
On Sep 1, 2004, at 10:46 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:


It's now owned by Leica.  I know it was his .... anyway, I'll drop the
issue.  People will believe what they choose to believe.

Shel

From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Yes, I've seen Jim Marshall's work, I consider him special because he
wasn't a one horse pony. He shot black and white, color, backlit and
front lit. I love the backlit photo of Eric Clapton that is almost a
silhouette and even the bright color full front lit shot of Spinal Tap.
But I've also seen a number of cameras that were purportedly his.
Perhaps this one truly was. Then again, perhaps it was not.


On Sep 1, 2004, at 10:27 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Black paint deteriorates as a result of a variety of factors, and
sometimes
quite quickly.  Vulcanite can last a lot longer.than black paint.
Perhaps
Leica replaced the Vulcanite when the camera went in for it's
servicing.
If I remember correctly, Leica now uses, or has used, the camera in
its ads.

Do you know who Jim Marshall is? Are you familiar with his work?





Reply via email to