On 13 Sep 2004 at 22:07, Alan Chan wrote: > I imagine the DA40/2.8 would be so cheap they must think why not? It draws > attention and won't cost much. But I much prefer they don't call it "Limited" > unless the whole thing was made of metal. As to the normal shooting range, I > think they have tried to cover with a few zooms which most people would buy > anyway.
Limited sounds about right, limited appeal, limited ergonomics, limited image quality (I assume its a classic Tessar design), just what were they thinking? Obviously not about a nice medium wide (~24mm) fast lens for their digital lens line up :-( Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
