On 16 Sep 2004 at 20:28, John C. O'Connell wrote: > For the price of what a > *istD costs I am not going to buy into the argument > that full K/M support would have driven up the cost in > any signifigant way because K/M support was provided > on many budget cameras, pentax made and third parties. > JCO
Yes, I wonder what the design and software development cost of the entirely newly conceived multiple exposure function added to the overall cost? That's something I wouldn't have missed. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
