Except reliability also means consistency - if it never works then it is 100% consistent and hence reliable, whichh I wuold imagine was Peters spin on things.
A. On 19/9/04 6:10 pm, "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Regarding the "reliablility" factor, HAVING a K/M lens cam/postional >> sensor is far more reliable than removing it altogether. > > Really? > > William Robb > > ======================== > Yes, at least it would work for a long while. > Without it at all, it NEVER works. No open aperture AE with > K/M lenses EVER period. The ultimate in unreliablity. > JCO > >
