JCO: You guys don't seem to understand the implication of abandoning support of K/M lenses with no technical ( and no one has yet proven it was a cost issue either) reason to do so. They have crossed the line and can longer be trusted to support anything you buy for any time as they may decide whatever they want to do on anything. What if they abandon A series next and when? There is now no limit to the shit they might pull now.
REPLY: You need to get a sense of propotion. JCO They have never done anything like this before so the sky is the limit for them now..... REPLY: Heard about the K-mount? They changed the mount with no change at all in functionality. No new feature whatsoever..... JCO: This K/M aperture ignorance is absurd in a top line camera from them that isn't even price competitive and that absurdity makes me no longer trust them at all..... REPLY: The *istD isn't intended as a top of the line camera. JCO The sad part is Both the K and the M lenses are better made (longer life) than the "A" series. Support the shit, abandon quality. What a policy. They are now in the disposable camera market. REPLY: I only own one K lens, the 18/3.5, and it is not better made than any of the A lenses I've owned over the years. In fact, some of the AF lenses I own is equally well made. P�l
