You cannot see the final composition before shooting with the pan
and stitch technique. You CAN with a conventional
camera technique. That is unequivably better feature. PERIOD.
Why use an SLR if you do care about
WSIWYG???? 
JCO

-----Original Message-----
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Large Format vs. Digital/Stitching



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Large Format vs. Digital/Stitching


> He cant compose, he cant do fleeting moments, he cant
> do selective focus, he cant do forground background
> in focus because you need tilt for that,etc. etc.
> He is only shooting the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
> With very limited techniques you end up with very limited vision. Its 
> better than nothing, but I do not buy into your BS that you don't need

> any of the above if you are on the west coast. That's just not 
> credible.

He did, however, come to the conclusion that for his shooting, digital
stitching was a preferable method to using a view camera. Witness the
fact that he is putting the stuff up for sale.

BTW, saying a person can't compose a picture using digital image
combining is total bullshit, and I am surprised that even you would come
up with a statement that is so utterly stupid.

If the technique doesn't work for you, thats fine. But why should
someone else limit their approach to your lowest common denominator?

William Robb


Reply via email to