On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:19:24 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sir you are too kind but it is positively amateurish compared to the > slick offerings coming fast and thick now.....
C'mon, Cotty, stop being so modest. Cormorant Times, although it may appear somewhat old-fashioned to today's sophisticated eye, is the genesis of it all. Where would we be without it? Looking at PUGs and PAWs and PESOs. Now, thanks to you, we have these amazingly slick faux-zine covers to help us wile away the hours. Saying Cormorant Times is amateurish is like saying a Spotmatic is an unsophisticated tool compared to a *istD. Different eras: two sophisticated (for their times) tools. Cormorant Times will always be remembered as The First One. She will forever live on in the minds of freedom and liberty-loving aquatic birders everywhere. Speaking of which, why did G Dubya have that funny lump on his back during the first debate? Sorry about the non-sequitor, but flowery but empty rhetoric reminds me of politicians for some reason. I'm leaving now... cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
