Even in the "film era" you changed the bodies
more often than the lenses....that is why there
are still so many fine K/M lenses still alive
and kicking...
JCO

-----Original Message-----
From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Minolta Maxxum wth BODY IS


I suspect that in the digital era you'll change the body more often than

the lenses.

Jack Davis wrote:

> Caveman,
> J. C. O'Connell's question asserts that body I.S.   
> is, obviously, a better idea..and I agree. That is,
> unless their competition wants to sell more lenses.
> 'ya think?
> 
> Jack
> 
> --- Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Canon and Nikon already addressed it and Mr.
>>Harakiri is too Limited.
>>
>>J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I just saw a magazine ad for the new Minolta
>>>Maxxum DSLR (their first DSLR ever) and it has
>>
>>Image stabilization
>>
>>>in the BODY. what I don't understand is why canon/nikon/pentax didn't

>>>do this already? JCO
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
>               
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! 
> http://vote.yahoo.com
> 
> 

Reply via email to