Believe it or not, I was sober when I wrote that. Bery interesting <vbg>
On Oct 16, 2004, at 7:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I get it. I didn't understand what you meant by plugsin. Bery
interesting. Where can I read more about these plugsins? Or were they
created specifically for your system?
Paul
On Oct 15, 2004, at 9:44 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
i never treat any of my images the same either. neither do my
plugins. they
can be set to achieve the results i want so long as the inputs are
somewhat
within reason. that is why i spent the money on specific plugins that
can be
tailored as to the results i get and not to the amount of any effect
i want
to apply.
Herb...
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D image quality-_Was -Stupid Question #999
I rarely treat two images exactly the same, so plug-ins wold be of
little
use for me. In truth, the RAW converters adjustments are far more
fine and
subtle than those of PS. I frequently change saturation by minute
amounts in
either direction, ditto white balance and color balance. The RAW
converter
allows extremely fine tuning of those kinds of variables.
