Re: PAW PESO - Spare some sex?

[Paul Stenquist]

Wow! What a difference a few inches make. Now I get a sense of how 
crisp the image is. And for the first time I see that the girl has a 
piereced nose and is wearing fishnet stockings. The fishnets seem to be 
almost a nod to prostitution, but the stocking cap says she really 
doesn't want to do this. It's truly a great shot, and I get much more 
enjoyment out of it at this size. Of course I'm old and half blind 
<vbg>.
Paul
On Oct 17, 2004, at 10:51 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:

OK, took your advice and put up a much larger image ... might be a slow
download for someone with a slow connection, but there's not much I 
could
do about it ... so, here's large and small:

http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh-lg.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh.html
Shel

From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think in most cases the web image should be cropped the same as the
print. The exception might be where there is interesting detail that
gets lost in a small image. Perhaps the ideal solution in regard to
your "Spare some sex" image would be a larger file. My web posts are
generally 13 inches on the long side at 72dpi. That's still viewable
without scrolling on all but the stingiest monitors.