I have nothing against the genre, with some exceptions:
- depicting recognizable humans in humiliating postures (make an effort not to show their face or at least photoshop a black band on the eyes or blur it or whatever it takes)
- continuing to post them in a certain forum after you've already been "lambasted" for doing it, knowing damn well the reaction they will produce, and actually be looking for such reaction
William Robb wrote:
My point wasn't so much to center you out for anything, as to point out that at one point you thought, no matter how reluctantly, that a social activist picture was a legitimate outlet for the art of photography.
