Yeah, that is really good. Nice use of the artistic filter, and a intriguing facial expression.
Yet this is exactly the kind of shot that straddles the art/pornography line. Which it is depends on the viewer. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/19/2004 2:19:11 AM >>> Sorry Paul, I didn't want to raise old controversy. I was only trying to explain that in some cases comments go way too far, compared to images which originated them. OK, here is a pic of mine, showing tits: http://www.dariobonazza.com/digfun/domenica01.jpg So that I'm a porn photographer too. Dario ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 11:29 PM Subject: Re: PAW PESO - Spare some sex? > I knew those tits would eventually show up in this discussion. > > On Oct 18, 2004, at 5:17 PM, Cotty wrote: > > > On 18/10/04, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > >> I don't think Shel to be a fanatic of shooting poverty, like I didn't > >> think > >> Paul to be a porn photographer for showing tits some time ago. I like > >> most > >> of Shel's (and Paul's) pictures and I want to see more of them here. > > > > Er, the tits? > > > > Oh alright then. > > > > (Come on everyone, you gotta hava larf eh?) > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Cotty > > > > > > ___/\__ > > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > > _____________________________ > > > > >
