On 18 Oct 2004 at 17:05, William Robb wrote: > I have always thought that to be "art" something must evoke some sort > of emotional response.
The only time that anything doesn't evoke an emotional response is when you're dead. I certainly don't believe that great art has to evoke heated debate or feelings of discomfort either. It can just as validly be something that sends you into a relaxed meditative state where you may be thinking less consciously. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
