>If Pentax were to produce one last new film cameras,
> what would you want it to be?
>My choice would be something like the LX but cut cost
> by eliminating the removable finder and use a different mirror bumper 
>system that doesn't need regular maintenance (sticky mirror). 
> Add the other modes, "A" interface, and a spot meter & we're set.  
>Probably a $500 body.  But built to last a lifetime.

I don't think anybody can build a $500 body that is "built to last a 
lifetime" anymore.  The Nikon FM-3a MIGHT be such a creature.  
Realistically, nobody builds $500 bodies anymore.  

>Personally, the AF cameras of Pentax haven't excited me.  
>They're either too plasticky (ZX/MZ) or too difficult to hold (PZ/Z).

I guess given what I currently do with Pentax I'd like to see something 
like an updated MX or a well-built ZX-M with AF.  It'd be small and 
straightforward, with mechanical connections but the ability to use
various forms of automation.  Ideally, it'd be at least partly 
mechanically controlled.   One could also look at such a camera as a 
smaller and more modern LX, but I agree that the "system camera" features 
such as a removable prism and add-on motor-drive are unnessesary.

It wouldn't be cheap due to the build quality, but $500 might be 
achievable.  Unfortunately, from what I understand Nikon isn't selling a 
lot of FM-3a cameras...

DJE


Reply via email to