Been done before
by bigger I meant more coverage (100% if possible) I beleive the coverage on the MZ-S is around 92%.
Its been done before:
Minolta Dynax 9 .73X magnification, 100% coverage, 22mm eyepoint Nikon F5 .75X magnification, 100% coverage, 20.5mm eyepoint
magnifcation is fine as it is on the MZ-S i beleive its .75x. The higher eyepoint is the thing that I would really apreceate coz I wear specs and am a left eye shooter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are opposites. You can not have both. High magnification means a bigger finder image and a shorter eyepoint. The best you can do is find an acceptable compromise. I personally prefer higher magnification as long as I can still see the whole viewfinder screen even if that means I have to cock my head a bit.
--
At 06:29 AM 10/21/2004 -0400, Patrick Genovese wrote:
For me it would be an MZ-S with the following changes.
1. Slightly bigger viewfinder and higher eyepoint.
