Hi Dave, As noted, TX is either ISO 320 or ISO 400, med format and 35mm respectively.
I like D76 with TX (Actually, I use Ilford ID-11, which is a very similar formulation) with hand processing. If you're going to be shooting in daylight where there are distinct shadows, by all means "pull" the film and cut back on the developing time. TMAX does not do well in D-76, IMO, and the grain and tonality are poor compared to TX .... but that's just my taste as I tend to like the more conventional, older style emulsions in general. And while I have little but some anecdotal "evidence", I think the older emulsions scan better (on Nikon film scanners and the Imacon scanners as that's where my experience is) than TMAX or other similar emulsions. Shel > [Original Message] > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'll be going to our Annual General Meeting for our equine zone this > afternoon,and it just so > happens its not very far from a camera store,and i need supplies.<vbg> > > I need more film developer,not enough of the Tmax to do two rolls, and i thought i might > give D76 a try > this time. I also would like to pick up a few rolls of Tri-x and see how they perform. > Does D 76 do a > good job on Tri-x AND T-max or should i get one of each and be selective. > > Also the Kodak site shows Tri-x is iso 320 and 400. No iso 100 or 200.?? I realize i can > pull if need > be,but just curious as to the absence of the lower speeds. > > Dave > > >
