[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'll be going to our Annual General Meeting for our equine zone this > afternoon,and it just so > happens its not very far from a camera store,and i need supplies.<vbg> > > I need more film developer,not enough of the Tmax to do two rolls, and i thought i > might > give D76 a try > this time. I also would like to pick up a few rolls of Tri-x and see how they > perform. > Does D 76 do a > good job on Tri-x AND T-max or should i get one of each and be selective. > > Also the Kodak site shows Tri-x is iso 320 and 400. No iso 100 or 200.?? I realize i > can > pull if need > be,but just curious as to the absence of the lower speeds. > > Dave >
Dave - Haven't read the other posts on this - I shot tri-x 400 rated as 320 and developed in microdol-x 1:3 at 75 degrees F for 15 minutes. It produced finer grain and better details, I felt. Can't show a proof of this online, but often photogs looking at my prints thought I was shooting plus-x. I never cared for D-76 and tried early T-max giving it to a photo processor and didn't care much for it. annsan > >
