On 24 Oct 2004 at 19:50, Dario Bonazza wrote: > I understand that focal length and shutter speed were not so obvious. > The funny thing is that apparently nobody among those who usually say the > *istD to be tack sharp (most *istD users out there) thought it to be capable of > such result ;-) It is also funny that somebody who usually criticize its > "softness" (me) has to prove it can be sharp ;-)
I think you only had to prove it to yourself, many of us didn't understand the original complaint, in any case I'm glad you've "seen the light" now :-) I hope you can be a bit happier shooting the *ist D knowing that it's not producing an inferior image (just don't compare it to any of the new bodies from other more prolific manufacturers :-) Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
