To my eye there is a slight camera shake involved.

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2813529

What do you think?

Lasse

From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: Samples from today's shoot with the FA 80-320


> I shot the lady at f6.7/1/500, handheld. The lens was full extended to 
> the 320 mm position, which is a field of view approximately equivalent 
> to a 480mm,  35mm lens. The ISO was 400. It was a RAW image, and I 
> processed it in PS CS. Sharpness was adjusted to 61. I bumped the 
> contrast a tiny bit and adjusted the exposure a small amount to fit the 
> histogram. I converted it to as a 144 megabyte 16-bit image and checked 
> levels, but made no changes. II resized it for the web as an 8-bit 
> image and saved it as a jpeg of approximately 130 K.
> 
> On Oct 23, 2004, at 6:26 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
> 
> > Looks like a very nice people/pet lens Paul.
> > I bought one last week for just that purpose, haven't had
> > a chance to play with it yet.
> > If my results are as pleasing as yours I'll be quite happy,
> > especially at the price. ($110.00)
> > Could we have a bit more info on camera/settings/processing, etc?
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:37 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Samples from today's shoot with the FA 80-320
> >>
> >>
> >> Here's a more telling example of the FA 80-320. No, it's not a 
> >> superior
> >> lens. But I think it's a very good lens for the money. The first shot
> >> is at f6,7, 120mm, handheld at 1/90. However, I think it's fairly
> >> steady. (Remember, this is the field of view of a 180mm lens.) The
> >> second is a 100% detail from the hi-res version of that  shot. If I
> >> have time, I'll do some tests off a tripod. But I'm convinced that 
> >> this
> >> lens is no bow-wow.
> >> Paul
> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2813525&size=lg
> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2813529
> >>
> >
> 

Reply via email to