Correct. the 80-320 is said to be much better - but how much? All the best! Raimo K Personal photography homepage at: http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:43 PM Subject: Re: Samples from today's shoot with the FA 80-320 > It's probably the FA 100-300mm, that everybody says is quite a dog!? > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Raimo K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 24. oktober 2004 22:06 > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: Re: Samples from today's shoot with the FA 80-320 > > > Detail? What detail? The subject has not much detail - but the image quality > seems to be OK. > All the best! > Raimo K > Personal photography homepage at: > http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 6:29 PM > Subject: Re: Samples from today's shoot with the FA 80-320 > > > > It turns out I tested the 80-320 some time ago, probably the day > > after after I bought my istD. > > I didn't think it was all that bad a lens, my test target was an > > office tower, and there is more than sufficient detail showing in the > > images: > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/80-320/ > > > > The page is four images, and is probably close to 500K. > > > > William Robb > > > > > > >
