Thanks, Mark.
have you noticed any "unsharpness" using 35mm wideangles like the 20-35mm
lens?
I have earlier posted a story, saying that a guy I know got he's money back
(on the *ist D) because there were no available wide angles for it. HE was
complaining abiout unsharp photographs from 35mm lenses.
Jens

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Mark Stringer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. oktober 2004 22:06
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Which wide angle zoom for the *ist D?


I have really enjoyed my FA 20-35/4 AL.  I use it more than my DA16-45 which
I am still uncomfortable because of occasional overexposure issues.  The
20-35 I've had no problems.  I mount it and go.  If I need wider angle I use
the DA 16-45 but I would just like to have a 16mm or 14mm prime.  I'm just
reluctant to buy the DA14 now till I see if  new DA lens have any issues.
All of my lens except the DA16-45 I use on a PZ1p also.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:34 PM
Subject: Which wide angle zoom for the *ist D?


> This may be a stupid (and already many times answered) question.
> But I can't seem to figure out how to spend money in the best posible way.
> I have many nice Pentax lenses, that I frequently use for "professional"
> work (for books/planning publications, development briefs, presentations
> etc.), mostly about architecture and planning.
>
> Since I started shooting with my Pentax *ist D, I need a wider zoom lense,
> preferbley 16mm-60mm :-)
>
> How would you rate the options?
>
> Pentax 18-55mm F4-5.6 = 180 Euros
> Petnax 16-45mm F4 = 456 Euros
> Sigma 18-50 3.5-5.6 DC = 99 Euros
> Sigma 18-125 3.5-5.6 DC = 245 Euros
> Sigma EX 18-50 F2.8 DC = 429 Euros
> Tokina AF 19-35mm 3.5-4.5 = 186 Euros
> Vivitar Series 1 19-35mm 3.5-4.5 = 117 Euros (ebay)
>
> Are there options I have overlaooked? Tamron SP?
>
> Jens Bladt
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
>
>
>



Reply via email to