You must have answered the wrong email!
Check my words below...
Speaking of which, I might be looking for a Tokina 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5...
Nice review, nice test shots...

keith  <g>

J. C. O'Connell wrote:

trade it for a ES instead of the ESII.
the ES has a 6v battery that you can
get a lithium that lasts for years....
JCO

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 9:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lens ruminations on a Monday...



Jim Colwell wrote:


Here is my review of the SMC Pentax-FA 28-200/3.8-5.6.

"I bought a 28-200mm zoom that turned out to be very unsatisfactory. Very few of the many pictures that I took were in sharp focus. The few pictures in sharp focus were probably those that I took with the SMCP-A 50/1.7. I did a little online research and soon found a number


of things, including:
(i) the zoom lens I bought is generally regarded as having poor

optical

quality; (ii)..."

This review is in the introduction to SPLOSdb. It does not explicitly


identify it as the -FA lens, but it is. This lens was made by Tamron for Pentax, to specs defined by Pentax. The Tamron branded 28-200 lens made at the same time to Tamron's own specs was sold at the same price and is reputed to be very good, especially in comparison with the -FA.

Jim
www.jcolwell.ca


Very interesting.
I think I'll forego both of those lenses...

I was heading over to the SPLOS database next.
But you brought it here! Many thanks...

keith






Reply via email to