Gerald wrote:
>Chris Brogden asks:
>
>> It's obvious that different people have different comfort levels when it
>> comes to criticism, and different expectations for their photos. What's
>> the general consensus? Should we go back to having no formal commenting
>> procedure and just comment individually on the photos we like? Should we
>> keep the commenting process the way it is now and trust the list to keep
>> things balanced? Or should we alter the commenting in any way? If so,
>> how?
>
>I suggested we allow submitters to opt out of commentaries on their
>photographs. I too might one day submit a known "dud" of a photograph just
>for the sake of sharing WITHOUT inviting critiques. For most images I will
>submit, however, I would like comments, both good and bad. I guess I could
>always use my personal web server for non-commented images, but it is
>different than PUG because of the large viewership PUG gets.
Why don't we do it the other way around? If I recall correctly, the critics
pretty much volunteered themselves--why not let the people who want
criticism volunteer to receive it? All they would have to do is include an
"I'd like criticism on this submission" in the text of their PUG submission
letter.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
