On Fri, 4 May 2001, Jan van Wijk wrote:
> I just like to say that I agree with Chris on this.
>
> Although I liked doing comments (and even more receiving them :-) it DID have
> a touch of "school-work". The assignment is also random, meaning you get to
> comment on images that you normally wouldn't have because they don't do
> anything to you.
>
> I think I'll be more comfortable commenting on the "highlights" that are in
> every PUG I have seen sofar ...
I forgot in my first letter to say thanks to everyone who volunteered to
comment, and who worked hard to write useful and constuctive comments
about photos that they might not even have cared about. I appreciate what
you did. And don't feel bad that it's over... we've just discovered one
way *not* to comment on the PUG, so in that sense the experiment was a
success. <g> I think the important thing is that we had an idea and
tried it. It didn't work out, but at least we tried, and now we know more
than we did before. Thanks, everyone!
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
