You're making me cry.
Tom C.
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: M42 ultra-wide Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:39:50 -0400
What about the 14mm DA 2.8 also being wider, faster, and costs a lot less?
QUESTION: Do the APS Pentax "DA" series lenses and/or APS bodies (*istD) have any sort of interlocks on them to prevent mounting DA lenses on any K series (FF) body? Do the DA series have aperture rings? Do the DA series have aperture cams (assuming they have rings)??? Curious...
JCO
-----Original Message----- From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: M42 ultra-wide
On 27 Oct 2004 at 9:20, William Robb wrote:
> Useless pictures. > To be valid, there has to be a swimming pool in the foreground.
Yes, my mistake. I guess that's why all the listers who have never owned/used one are still discrediting its performance. From what I've seen of test pics from the DA14/2.8 there isn't a great deal of advantage over the 15/3.5 apart from the reduced size and weight.
Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
