Gerald wrote in reply to Fairy:
> It is you, not "we", who is talking about tact and
> consideration on this
> thread. I started this thread as a defense of not needing to
> care much
> about tact and consideration with PUG comments. After having
> read other's
> viewpoints on it, I still hold the same opinion.
Tact and consideration has been hallmarks of the PDML for as long as I've
been around. It's part of what makes it a nice list. Sometimes there have
been people going out of line, but it has always been sorted out. And it
will this time too, I'm sure. Neither Fairy or Gerald (or any others
involved in this thread so far) are lacking abilities to clear things up
with tact and consideration (hopefully I too can contribute in that
direction).
Rough comments can be beneficial sometimes, but I'd like the PUG to be
without them. There are other places on the net for that. In fact, making a
gallery like ours _without_ rough critiques to follow is a rare treat. I
think we'd loose a lot of contributors if we change and become "just another
critique'd site".
Jostein
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
