And think of long focal length (so much prone to thermal focus shift) on
small format film (so much demanding about proper focus). The Graphic is
another thing: not enough long focus and not enough small format to show the
problem, I guess.
I can assure you that precise focus at infinity is a well-known  issue among
astrophotographers.
Please also read my previous message on this same topic.

Dario

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!


> What are you guys shooting at? f/1.4 with a 10,000mm lens? For an example
with
> the 135mm f4.7 on the Graphic set to f/4.7 and infinity everything from 94
feet
> to the Andromeda Galaxy is in focus (I use that lens because it is one I
have
> calculated). So if my focus is set anyplace between 94 feet and infinity,
object
> at infinity will be in focus. It is not like you don't have any depth of
field
> to work with when your subject is 235 thousand miles away. Even if your
> hyperfocal distance is something like 10 thousand miles your DOF is far
more
> than enough to insure proper focus. That BTW is why autofocus is so
problematic
> at infinity. The system can not tell the difference between the hyperfocal
> distance and actual infinity. Though as long as you are not blowing the
photo up
> beyond the value used to calculate the DOF infinity should still appear
sharp.
>
> Now if you are shooting something at 20 feet with a 600mm f/4.0 lens
having your
> infinity mark off a 1/4mm or so is going to affect scale focusing, but it
will
> not at infinity you just have too much slack to work with out there.
>
> -- 
>
> Herb Chong wrote:
> > the infinity mark isn't actually focused for an object at infinity
except at
> > a specific temperature.
> >
> > Herb....
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
> >
> >
> >
> >>Ummmm..?
> >>
> >>Surely the moon is at infinity. I can not even begin to see how you
could
> >
> > have a
> >
> >>focus problem. Autofocus problem yes, focus no.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> graywolf
> http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
>
>

Reply via email to