Actually, the biggest difference I know of is the K is very sharp but some think it has rather harsh boke, (though there is some dissent from that opinion...).
The M is not quite as sharp by reputation, I find it to be a bit soft wide open but it produces a very pleasing out of focus rendition. Sharp enough stopped
down however, in my opinion.
Usually the M-100 can be purchased for quite a bit less than the K-105. Though the $49.00 price on the ebay auction probably won't stand.
Jens Bladt wrote:
Do you know in which way this differs from the K 2.8/105mm, which I like a lot? It's vquite sharp even at F2.8.
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 31. oktober 2004 10:22 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: KEH M100/2.8
On 31 Oct 2004 at 10:07, Shen wrote:
I don't think it is cheap.
Please see
SMC-M 100mm / f2.8
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3848
Not for long...
Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke
