Thanks Paul, actually I was going to shoot the cat. (with the camera!) But I had to settle for dog fur to test the lens, the cat wouldn't hold still long enough. ;-)
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 5:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: NOW I understand! was_ KEH M100/2.8 > > > Good shot. And good catch on that faulty lens repair. It's a nice lens. > I had one at one time and used it quite successfully. Its compact size > is definitely an advantage. Again, nice work on that shot of > Beauregard. > Paul > On Oct 31, 2004, at 5:59 PM, Don Sanderson wrote: > > > You guys really had me going wondering what all the fuss was about > > regarding the M100/2.8.
