Perhaps true, but:
1. The printer will interpolate the image files to make larger prints from
jpegs.
2. No Photgraphic paper can really resolve/print 100 lpm anyway.
3. The lack of grain helps too, I guess
4. Only the very best lenses can actually resolve 100 lpm, most probably
more like 50 lpm

30 lpm is equal to 60* pixel pr. mm or 24x30x2 = 1440 pixel for a 24mm
sensor.

* = One lpm being "one black and one white line" (According to USAF target
group 0 pair 1 which is app. 1mm)

So, I guess a SONY 3008 pixels 24mm sensor can resolve something like
3008/2/24 = 62 lpm equal to app 3200 ppi.
That's not so bad after all, is it? I know I could never get more out of a
35mm neg, if I scanned to more than perhaps half of that - i.e. 1600ppi!

I know this is just basic math, that doesn't really have anything to do with
the world of electronics (which most of the time  is mumbo-jumbo to me,
anyway). But nevertheless - a 62 lpm lens can still do a nice job on film,
right? Lot's of Pentax lenses are not capable of doing 100 lpm this on let's
say a 400 asa film at f5.6, hand held at 1/125 :-).

Forgive my simple reasoning - but it's really not that far from what we are
in fact experiencing. I mean - look at the digital images/prints. They are
not all that bad, are they.


Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. november 2004 04:29
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: Re: USAF target and resolution tests



----- Original Message -----
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: USAF target and resolution tests


> On 2 Nov 2004 at 19:32, Mishka wrote:
>
>> something doesn't add up -- "great" 11x14 prints and 30 lpmm
>> system
>> resolution cannot be true at the same time.

The lack of grain goes a long way towards saving digital from itself.

>
> Yes it can if you don't know what "great" looks like.
>
> Go see some nice 11x14 BW contact prints and then decide what
> the word "great" should be reserved for. The clarity and
> "rightness" of THOSE 11x14s is what I would call "great"
> and you don't need a lupe or rub your nose on it to see it.

Right you are.

William Robb





Reply via email to